Closing thoughts

.

Chapter 7 in The Conceptual Structure of EU Competition Law, 2024, pp 243-246 from Edward Elgar Publishing

Abstract: In the last three decades, EU competition law has seen the emergence and exacerbation of several structural inconsistencies and contradictions, which symptomatize the loss of a doctrinal compass. First, discarding the notion that anticompetitive object is a category-building principle applied through specified object categories, the CJEU embraced the notion that anticompetitive object can be established by means of the comprehensive case-by-case analysis. Second, the case law confuses the object-inquiry’s contextual analysis with effects-analysis. Third, Article 101 has seen a remarkable proliferation of specified object categories. Fourth, EU competition law has developed no abbreviated effects-analysis and employs no sliding scale. Fifth, Article 101(3) has not found its place in competition analysis.

Keywords: Law - Academic; Law - Professional (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781035311842.00012 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:22312_7

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().