Assessing digital transformation maturity in manufacturing: a six-dimensional framework applied to operating model evaluation

Arnauld Schaller and Ronald Vatananan-Thesenvitz

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2026, 1-22

Abstract: PurposeDigital transformation (DT) is a strategic imperative, yet organizations lack systematic methods to assess digital maturity across operating model components. This study demonstrates the practical applicability of a six-dimensional maturity assessment framework in a manufacturing context, providing proof-of-concept for its utility in measuring DT progress across an operating model.Design/methodology/approachA 41-item, six-dimensional model was applied at a mid-sized German mechanical engineering firm (290 employees; €100M revenue). An Excel-based self-assessment tool with seven calculation formulas measured current and target maturity, gaps, importance, and prioritization; data were collected via structured self-assessment by the general manager, validated through a semi-structured interview, and visualized with radar charts.FindingsOverall current maturity was 3.6 against a 4.6 target. These case-specific results are proof-of-concept outputs, not statistically validated benchmarks. Technology and Tools (3.4) and Data (3.2) showed the lowest maturity; Technology and Tools had the largest gap (1.2) – driven by tool fragmentation from unregulated M&A leaving 36 standalone systems – and the highest priority score (3.9).Practical implicationsStructured assessment heightens awareness of DT complexity, supports importance- and gap-based prioritization, and enables evidence-based resource allocation. Practitioners should address single-respondent subjectivity through multi-stakeholder involvement and budget for continuous investment to sustain maturity.Originality/valueAlthough the integration of operating model and maturity theory draws on established streams, the study’s originality lies in operationalizing that integration into a deployable 41-item instrument with seven formulas and an importance-weighted prioritization mechanism. This first documented field application offers a replicable, transparently documented methodology and contributes three theoretical propositions on DT maturity dynamics.

Keywords: Digital transformation; Maturity model; Operating model; Case study; Assessment framework; Manufacturing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/ijppm/article/doi/10.1108/ ... ormation-maturity-in (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/ijppm/article-pdf/doi/10.1 ... m-11-2025-1181en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:ijppmp:ijppm-11-2025-1181

DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-11-2025-1181

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management is currently edited by Dr Aylin Ates and Dr Berk Kucukaltan

More articles in International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().