Numerical methods to value an option including risk aversion with a constant relative risk aversion function

Julian A. Pareja-Vasseur, Freddy H. Marin-Sanchez and Diego Manzur

Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 2025, vol. 31, issue 61, 93-123

Abstract: PurposeThis study develops a comprehensive discrete numerical model for option valuation that explicitly incorporates risk preferences, which may deviate from risk neutrality. Unlike the traditional binomial tree models – strictly under the risk-neutral paradigm – our framework embeds a constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) utility specification, capturing heterogeneous attitudes toward risk while preserving the arbitrage-free pricing rule.Design/methodology/approachThe model extends the multiplicative binomial recombination tree (MBRT) by adjusting key parameters – transition probabilities, growth factors, discount rates and drift/diffusion terms – to reflect the investor's degree of risk aversion. The classical Cox-Ross-Rubinstein binomial tree (CRR) emerges as a special case when risk aversion is set to zero. The methodology remains consistent with geometric Brownian motion (GBM) dynamics and is benchmarked against a modified Monte Carlo simulation to ensure robustness.FindingsResults show that option values can be consistently derived under both traditional risk-neutral settings and preference-driven settings. Sensitivity analysis highlights the impact of time to maturity, volatility, strike price and the risk-free rate under varying levels of risk aversion.Research limitations/implicationsWhile this research offers significant theoretical and practical contributions, certain limitations warrant further study. Computational complexity: the CRRA-based valuation method introduces additional numerical challenges, requiring precise calibration and advanced optimization techniques. Dependence on risk aversion estimates: the model assumes that investor risk preferences can be accurately measured and remain stable, which may not always reflect dynamic market conditions. Absence of a closed-form solution: our proposed approach lacks an analytical closed-form solution. Therefore, it is crucial to dedicate efforts to its development.Practical implicationsThe integration of CRRA utility functions into derivative valuation represents a key innovation, as it explicitly accounts for investor risk preferences beyond the traditional risk-neutral paradigm. This framework advances the literature on utility-based and nonlinear risk-adjusted pricing by demonstrating how variations in the relative risk aversion (RRA) coefficient shape option values. From a practical perspective, the model offers a flexible tool for portfolio managers, traders and policymakers by aligning valuations with observed market behavior while preserving consistency with classical models under specific conditions. Accurate calibration of risk preferences thus becomes essential for reliable pricing and policy design.Originality/valueThe novelty of this research lies in bridging utility-based preferences with recombining lattice valuation: while prior studies focused exclusively on risk-neutral or arbitrage-based approaches, our model incorporates explicit risk aversion into the numerical structure. By deriving general algebraic expressions and validating the framework through numerical experiments, this study offers a tractable and versatile tool for analyzing option prices under heterogeneous risk attitudes, without losing the analytical clarity of traditional methods.

Keywords: Pricing; Binomial trees; Monte Carlo; Numerical methods; Options (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/jefas/article/31/61/93/132 ... -an-option-including (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/jefas/article-pdf/31/61/93 ... s-01-2025-0047en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jefasp:jefas-01-2025-0047

DOI: 10.1108/JEFAS-01-2025-0047

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science is currently edited by Nestor U. Salcedo

More articles in Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().