EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Audit committees and climate risk disclosure: a transformer-based textual analysis approach

Damian Honey, Hussain Muhammad and Stefania Migliori

Managerial Auditing Journal, 2026, 1-32

Abstract: PurposeThis study aims to examine whether audit committee (AC) attributes are associated with the extent of climate risk disclosure in mandated US annual reports, distinguishing between physical- and transition-risk discussion in 10-K Item 1A (Risk Factors).Design/methodology/approachUsing S&P 500 firms, the study extracts Item 1A from 10-K filings and applies a transformer-based NLP classifier (ClimateBERT) to score firm-year physical- and transition-risk disclosure. Multiple regression models and alternative proxies are used to test the robustness of results.FindingsThe results show that AC independence, gender diversity and expertise are associated with higher physical- and transition-risk disclosure, consistent with stronger monitoring and closer review of climate-related narratives in 10-K filings. Longer committee tenure is linked to lower disclosure, suggesting that familiarity with management may soften scrutiny over time. The presence of an AC is also associated with higher disclosure. These results are stronger in carbon-intensive sectors and remain stable across multiple robustness tests.Research limitations/implicationsThe study is limited to large US non-financial firms (S&P 500), which may restrict generalizability. The dependent variables are disclosure-based measures derived from textual classification of Item 1A and reflect how risks are communicated rather than underlying exposure.Practical implicationsBoards, AC chairs and investors can expect AC composition to shape the depth and clarity of climate-risk discussion in 10-K risk factors. Independence, gender mix and expertise are linked to fuller narratives that help users assess physical hazards and transition pressures. Regulators may also view AC features as part of the reporting system that helps explain cross-firm differences in climate-risk communication under a common US regime.Originality/valueThe study connects AC design to climate-risk disclosure in Form 10-K filings by using transformer-based text analytics that separate physical from transition risk within Item 1A. This provides fresh evidence on how reporting oversight relates to emerging-risk narratives and offers a scalable method for governance–disclosure research.

Keywords: Audit committee characteristics; Climate risk disclosure; Physical risk; Transition risk; Transformer-based NLP; S&P 500; United States; US S&P 500 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/maj/article/doi/10.1108/MA ... te-risk-disclosure-a (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/maj/article-pdf/doi/10.110 ... j-08-2025-4955en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:majpps:maj-08-2025-4955

DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-08-2025-4955

Access Statistics for this article

Managerial Auditing Journal is currently edited by Professor Jie Zhou

More articles in Managerial Auditing Journal from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().

 
Page updated 2026-11-04
Handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:maj-08-2025-4955