Measuring conduct risk in South African banks

Antje Hargarter and Gary Van Vuuren

Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 2019, vol. 11, issue 3, 282-304

Abstract: Purpose - This paper aims to examine the problem of conduct-risk measurement for banks, using South Africa as an example of a developing market. Conduct risk is a new and complex phenomenon in global financial services and could negatively impact various stakeholders. There are concerns about new regulations and potential misconduct fines affecting profitability and sustainability for banks. While presenting a serious problem, especially in developing markets, with the added challenge of financial inclusion, conduct risk and its measurement have not been researched sufficiently. If the measurement problem could be solved, the management could be facilitated. Design/methodology/approach - Based on a literature review, existing surveys and new interviews, a best-practice proposal for measuring conduct risk was developed. The approach was exploratory and inductive and added primary insights. Findings - Measuring concepts like conduct is a global challenge. This aside, South African banking customers are concerned about fraud and safety and administrative service hassles, rather than conduct in the regulatory sense. Best-practice measurement must account for these findings by working with a scoring for behavioural, organisational/procedural and perception indicators and with suggestions for specific surveys. Research limitations/implications - Analysing the data measured and deciding what action should be taken if conduct risk is detected could be considered for additional research. Practical implications - South African banks are guided in measuring a difficult and unique concept at a time of regulatory change, stakeholder pressures and limited existing knowledge. Originality/value - The authors believe this is the first study on a critical and new challenge in banking risk measurement in a developing market.

Keywords: South Africa; Banks; Conduct risk; Twin Peaks model; G21; G32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:qrfmpp:qrfm-03-2018-0027

DOI: 10.1108/QRFM-03-2018-0027

Access Statistics for this article

Qualitative Research in Financial Markets is currently edited by Prof Bruce Burton

More articles in Qualitative Research in Financial Markets from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().