The framing of sustainability by different stakeholder groups in India: Perspectives, consequences and implications

Lutz Preuss, Priyanka Chhaparia, Bimal Arora and Isabel Fischer

Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2025, vol. 17, issue 2, 333-363

Abstract: PurposeAchieving sustainable development relies on the engagement by leaders from businesses, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and governments, particularly in emerging economies, where economic growth often creates tensions with social and environmental externalities. Therefore, our research aims to shed new light on how different stakeholders in India frame sustainability, paying attention to the congruence of diagnostic, prognostic and motivational framing tasks.Design/methodology/approachWe applied a two-phase qualitative design, consisting of 32 semi-structured interviews (to generate a deeper understanding of the framings by different stakeholders) and a focus group discussion with eight key stakeholders (to validate the findings of the interviews).FindingsWe find two distinct framings across stakeholder groups of sustainability versus corporate social responsibility (CSR). Sustainability is framed as comprising environmental issues (diagnostic framing), requiring private sector solutions (prognostic framing) driven by the business case (motivational framing). CSR is framed as comprising social issues (diagnostic framing) that are the remit of government (prognostic framing), to be addressed through regulation (motivational framing).Practical implicationsBusinesses and other stakeholders in India tend to view sustainability and CSR as distinct, compartmentalizing respective expenses and impact. This divergence from more holistic, international framings, while potentially reflecting local contexts, poses challenges for businesses and other stakeholders operating in the globalized arena.Social implicationsLegislators need to be aware of the influence of current public policy on domestic framings of social and environmental sustainability as being unrelated activities. Instead, they should consider promoting a holistic approach to sustainability, thus maximizing benefits for all stakeholders.Originality/valueGoing beyond prior literature, we show how actors’ frames on sustainability and CSR, respectively, are linked – in themselves but in parallel to each other – through diagnostic, prognostic and motivational framing tasks. While the two frames remain separate from each other, the three framing tasks generate a high degree of congruence within each frame; therefore, both frames have a high degree of credibility and salience. Where different framings of one and the same issue exist, individuals commonly push for framings to become either more similar to or more different from each other. In our case, neither of these happened; rather, individuals keep the tension between the two frames alive, resulting in a novel frame alignment process – which we termed frame separation.

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Sustainability; Frames and framing; Emerging economies; India; Sustainable development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/sampj/article/17/2/333/127 ... ability-by-different (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/sampj/article-pdf/17/2/333 ... j-03-2024-0189en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:sampjp:sampj-03-2024-0189

DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2024-0189

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal is currently edited by Prof Carol Adams

More articles in Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().