Comparison of TEAR and TFRC throughput for Drop tail and RED Queue Management Techniques

Parminderjeet Singh, Ameeta Dilbaghi and Nipun Sharma
Additional contact information
Parminderjeet Singh: PCET Lalru
Ameeta Dilbaghi: PCET Lalru
Nipun Sharma: Quest Group of Institutions Mohali

Oeconomics of Knowledge, 2014, vol. 6, issue 4, 18-23

Abstract: The comparison of throughput for TEAR (TCP emulation at receivers) and TFRC TCP friendly rate control in MANETs is done with varying Active queue Management Techniques. The analysis reveals that for bandwidth constraint links, TEAR and TFRC perform far better than normal traffic propagation through TCP. In case of TEAR, the processing and route congestion algorithm load is shared by the receiver resulting in lesser load at the transmitters. In TFRC the TCP traffic is propagated via an algorithm to curb acknowledgement congestions. The effect of these two techniques is monitored on Droptail and RED, two of the most common Active Queue Management Techniques.

JEL-codes: O33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://sites.google.com/site/oeconomicsofknowledg ... s.pdf?attredirects=0 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eok:journl:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:18-23

Access Statistics for this article

Oeconomics of Knowledge is currently edited by Saphira Publishing House

More articles in Oeconomics of Knowledge from Saphira Publishing House
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Felician ALECU ().