EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation of Stress Transfer at Bone Implant Interface in Emulate Implant and Conventional Endosseous Implant: A Comparative 3-D Finite Element Analysis Study

S. Tyagi, K. Shetty, G. Issar, S. Rani, S. Kumar, H. G. Jagadeesh and S. Khan
Additional contact information
S. Tyagi: I.T.S Dental College, India
K. Shetty: I.T.S Dental College, India
G. Issar: I.T.S Dental College, India
S. Rani: I.T.S Dental College, India
S. Kumar: Teerthankar Dental College, India
H. G. Jagadeesh: I.T.S Dental College, India
S. Khan: I.T.S Dental College, India

European Journal of Dental and Oral Health, 2020, vol. 1, issue 5

Abstract: Aim: Aim of this study was to evaluate and compare stress transfer at bone implant interface in customized root form implant and conventional endosseous implant. Materials and methodology: A three-dimensional finite element model of Emulate implant and conventional endosseous implant (nobel active 4.2X11.5mm) was generated. The implants were restored with metal ceramic crown and subjected to 20 Mpa of axial applied stress. Resolved stresses were examined at four heights along the implant bone interface. Results: In conventional endosseous implant with 100 % osseointegration higher stresses (1.01-0.12 MPa) were concentrated on the facial surface of crest of implant. The stresses decreased from junction of cortical bone and trabecular bone to the apex of implant (0.36 – 0.12 MPa). The maximum stresses on emulate implant with 100 % osseointegration were at the facial surface of the crest of implant (0.05 MPa) which were comparatively lesser than conventional endosseous implant (1.01 MPa). Conclusion: The degree of osseointegration affected the stress levels or distributions around both implants. Crestal stresses were always higher than apical stress. When the implants were 100% osseointegrated, then stresses were higher on conventional endosseous implant while in case of 50% osseointegration, stresses were higher on emulate implant.

Keywords: customized root form; endosseous; FEA; stress (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdent/article/view/13029 Abstract page (text/html)
https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdent/article/download/13029/2710 Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:epw:ejdent:v:1:y:2020:i:5:id:13029

DOI: 10.24018/ejdent.2020.1.5.29

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Journal of Dental and Oral Health from European Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Support Team ().

 
Page updated 2026-06-22
Handle: RePEc:epw:ejdent:v:1:y:2020:i:5:id:13029