EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Repair Responses of Pulp Tissues after Different Direct Pulp Capping Materials at Different Storage Time

Ali Yakout Dogheim, Khaled Mohamed Noaman, Khadiga Youssef Kawana and Walaa Mohamed Al Samolly
Additional contact information
Ali Yakout Dogheim: Alexandria University, Egypt
Khaled Mohamed Noaman: Al-Azhar University, Egypt
Khadiga Youssef Kawana: Al-Azhar University, Egypt
Walaa Mohamed Al Samolly: Alexandria University, Egypt

European Journal of Dental and Oral Health, 2021, vol. 2, issue 3, 11-16

Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare histologically the repair response following direct pulp capping of mechanically exposed dogs' teeth with: Dycal, UltraBlend Plus and TheraCal LC: at different time intervals (1 week, 1 month and 3 months) Materials and methods: A total of 54 permanent teeth of six healthy male mongrel dogs were used, divided into three groups (n=18) according to pulp capping material used. Group I: Dycal, Group II: UltraBlend Plus and Group III: TheraCal LC. All cavities were restored with Riva LC Resine Modified Glass Ionomer. Each group was subdivided into three subgroups according to storage time (n=6). Control samples (3 teeth) were added representing normal untouched teeth. The specimens were fixed, decalcified, processed to paraffin blocks. Serial sections of 5 microns thickness were prepared and stained with H&E then examined under light microscope for histologic examination and were evaluated histologically for pulp tissue organization and reparative tissue formation following scoring system used by Nowicka et al. Results: As regards calcific barrier, all three materials, by the end of third month showed: continuity (score 3) with irregular dentin bridge formation, the morphology showed mostly irregular hard tissue and the tubules were mild in most specimens. Conclusion: Theracal is superior to Dycal and UBP for pulp capping of mechanically exposed human teeth, it can be used as an effective direct pulp capping material. There was no statistically significant difference between the three capping agents by end of third evaluation period as regards calcific barrier and odontoblastic layer.

Keywords: Calcific barrier; Direct pulp capping; Dycal; TheraCal; Ulrtra blend plus (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdent/article/view/13055 Abstract page (text/html)
https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdent/article/download/13055/2732 Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:epw:ejdent:v:2:y:2021:i:3:id:13055

DOI: 10.24018/ejdent.2021.2.3.55

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Journal of Dental and Oral Health from European Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Support Team ().

 
Page updated 2026-06-22
Handle: RePEc:epw:ejdent:v:2:y:2021:i:3:id:13055