Comparative Evaluation of Probability Distribution Models of Flood flow in Lower Niger Basin

Itolima Ologhadien
Additional contact information
Itolima Ologhadien: Rivers State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria

European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 2021, vol. 6, issue 2, 107-117

Abstract: The choice of optimum probability distribution model that would accurately simulate flood discharges at a particular location or region has remained a challenging problem to water resources engineers. In practice, several probability distributions are evaluated, and the optimum distribution is then used to establish the quantile - probability relationship for planning, design and management of water resources systems, risk assessment in flood plains and flood insurance. This paper presents the evaluation of five probability distributions models: Gumbel (EV1), 2-parameter lognormal (LN2), log pearson type III (LP3), Pearson type III(PR3), and Generalised Extreme Value (GEV) using the method of moments (MoM) for parameter estimation and annual maximum series of five hydrological stations in the lower Niger River Basin in Nigeria. The choice of optimum probability distribution model was made on five statistical goodness – of – fit measures; modified index of agreement (Dmod), relative root mean square error (RRMSE), Nash – Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), Percent bias (PBIAS), ratio of RMSE and standard deviation of the measurement (RSR), and probability plot correlation coefficient (PPCC). The results show that GEV is the optimum distribution in 3 stations, and LP3 in 2 stations. On the overall GEV is the best – fit distribution, seconded by PR3 and thirdly, LP3. Furthermore, GEV simulated discharges were in closest agreement with the observed flood discharges. It is recommended that GEV, PR3 and LP3 should be considered in the final selection of optimum probability distribution model in Nigeria.

Keywords: probability distribution model; optimum; floods; lower Niger River basin; goodness – of – fits (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/view/62352 Abstract page (text/html)
https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/download/62352/12617 Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:6:y:2021:i:2:id:62352

DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2021.6.2.2352

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research from European Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Support ().