Accountability deficits in European ‘Comitology’ decision-making

Gijs Jan Brandsma

European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 2007, vol. 11

Abstract: Comitology committees are often accused of not being accountable. This paper aims to provide building blocks to analyze the validity of this claim. After briefly discussing the meaning and aims of accountability, it is discussed where the actual accountability problems can be expected. Institutionally, one may expect them between the committees and the Commission on one side, and the Council and European Parliament on the other. Even the currently introduced new procedures cannot fully remedy accountability problems emerging there. Individually, one may expect accountability problems in the delegation of tasks to more or less autonomously operating experts. This twofold analysis may help further empirical research in this area.

Keywords: comitology; accountability; multilevel governance; implementation; European Commission; European Parliament; Council of Ministers; political science (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-05-25
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2007-004a.htm Abstract (text/html)
http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2007-004.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0158

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://eiop.or.at/eiop/

Access Statistics for this article

European Integration online Papers (EIoP) is currently edited by Gerda Falkner

More articles in European Integration online Papers (EIoP) from European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial Assistant ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).