Adversary or ‘depoliticized’ institution? Democratizing the Constitutional Convention

Thorsten Hüller

No 7, RECON Online Working Papers Series from RECON

Abstract: This paper is about a counterfactual empirical assumption: If the Laeken convention had been elected, we would have had a more democratic as well as a more legitimate process of European constitution making. Electing conventioneers and re-opening the convention is probably a successful way to gain a real constitutional moment and to lead the EU out of its current legitimacy-trap. An elected convention would probably be more democratic, because such an institution would be more public as well as more accountable to the people, without significant expectable deliberative losses. Effective involvement of citizens at an early stage can also be expected to be a cure for the failures connected to the late politicization during Dutch and French referenda.

Keywords: accountability; Constitution for Europe; deliberative democracy; democracy; European elections; European Convention; legitimacy; referendum (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-07-15
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_0707.pdf?fileitem=5456964 Full text (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:erp:reconx:p0007

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RECON Online Working Papers Series from RECON
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marit Eldholm ().