Are Digital Services Taxes Consistent with Double Tax Conventions? A critical assessment of a comment by Philip Baker (Japanese)

Keigo Fuchi

Discussion Papers (Japanese) from Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI)

Abstract: This paper examines the background of the Digital Services Taxes (DSTs) and the recent debate on the DSTs. The first half of the paper points out the critical impact of the digitalization of the economy, especially in terms of the widespread presence of transactions in which domestic consumers purchase goods and services directly from foreign businesses, and on income taxation and consumption taxation as a background for the emergence of the DSTs, as we must consider various kinds of taxes, rather than just traditional taxes (income, consumption, and property). In the second half, we critically examine Philip Baker’s view that the DSTs may be consistent with double tax conventions. He concludes that a tax based on the gross amount of payment is not an income tax and therefore exempt from treaty discipline. However, we believe that his argument is unpersuasive and that the DSTs should be considered a violation of tax treaties, and the fact that the United States disagrees with Pillar One of the international agreements on digital taxation (allocation of tax resources to market countries) is therefore unsurprising.

Pages: 36 pages
Date: 2024-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/24j020.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:24020

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers (Japanese) from Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by TANIMOTO, Toko ().