The most valuable discussion about the nature of language that never took place from Wittgenstein to Baldwin via Calvino

Warmhold Jan Thomas Mollema
Additional contact information
Warmhold Jan Thomas Mollema: Utrecht University, Nederland

European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles, 2024, vol. 10

Abstract: James Baldwin and Ludwig Wittgenstein were both concerned with what language use is capable of and what the duty of the thinker should be. This essay examines, via Italo Calvino’s ideas on the relationship between writing and world, what the contrast Wittgenstein/Baldwin tells us about the ethics of meaning, Wittgenstein’s ‘leaves everything as it is’ conception of thought is contrasted with Baldwin’s thoughts on racism, language and the duty of the writer. It is concluded that Baldwin drives Wittgenstein’s philosophical position further than Wittgenstein could do himself and that ethically neutral language use is itself a linguistic confusion.

Keywords: Wittgenstein; Calvino; Baldwin; language; ethics of meaning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://brucol.be/index.php/ejls/article/view/8652 (text/html)
https://brucol.be/files/articles/ejls_v10_i1_24/Mollema.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:277

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles from Revistia Research and Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Revistia Research and Publishing ().