Retiring the Historical Net Discount Rate

Kurt V. Krueger

Journal of Forensic Economics, 2016, vol. 26, issue 2, 147-180

Abstract: The methodology of using a net discount rate (“NDR”) to calculate the present value of future labor earnings is now over 50 years old. First found in public health economics, the earnings NDR later reached forensic economics where it was adapted to other calculations such as the present value of medical costs. At first, some forensic economists embraced the historically determined wage NDR arguing that it was simple, fair, and 0% since annual wage growth and interest rates had been fairly equal to that time. The 0% wage NDR did not sit well with some other forensic economists, and so a discourse began in the literature regarding its numeric value. Largely missing from the debate has been an analysis of the historically determined NDR, as it has been constructed and used, as a legitimate present value methodology. Building upon the initial criticisms of the NDR by Jones (1985, 1986) and the recent work of Foster (2015), this article examines the historical wage NDR method and concludes that, for several reasons, it is theoretically faulty, empirically inconsistent, and not relevant to forensic economics.

JEL-codes: K13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.journalofforensiceconomics.com/doi/abs/10.5085/372.1 (text/html)
http://www.journalofforensiceconomics.com/doi/pdf/10.5085/372.1 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fek:papers:doi:10.5085/372.1

DOI: 10.5085/372.1

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Forensic Economics from National Association of Forensic Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kurt Krueger ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).