Personal Consumption and Single Persons: A Reply to Thomas R. Ireland

Kurt V. Krueger

Journal of Forensic Economics, 2013, vol. 24, issue 1, 105-107

Abstract: After an exchange of comments, Ireland now agrees that could-based lost support analysis is appropriate as long as “could” is not represented as “would.” So, regarding the forensic economic convention of “could” or “contingent” based analysis in wrongful death, our exchange nets to zero.

JEL-codes: K13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.journalofforensiceconomics.com/doi/abs/10.5085/jfe.24.1.105 (text/html)
http://www.journalofforensiceconomics.com/doi/pdf/10.5085/jfe.24.1.105 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fek:papers:doi:10.5085/jfe.24.1.105

DOI: 10.5085/jfe.24.1.105

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Forensic Economics from National Association of Forensic Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kurt Krueger ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).