Modelos quantitativos de apoio às decisões - II

Pierre Jacques Ehrlich

RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, 1996, vol. 36, issue 2

Abstract: The success of Decision Analysis as support for problems with a single predominant obiective opened the road to more ambitious decision problems with Multicriteria and Group Decisions (these two use similar techniques). The natural evolution of Decision Analysis is the MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory). Its theoretical rigor makes it difficult to be used by non-specifically trained analysts. As a consequence, appeared the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) extremely easy to use. The criticism on the AHP came from theEuropean school with several methods known under the name MCDA (Multicriteria Decision Aid).

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/38068 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fgv:eaerae:v:36:y:1996:i:2:a:38068

Access Statistics for this article

RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas is currently edited by Eduardo Diniz

More articles in RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas from FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Núcleo de Computação da FGV EPGE ().