Gender attitudes in agriculture and positivity bias: A survey experiment in four countries in Sub-Saharan Africa

Catherine Ragasa, Isabel B. Lambrecht, Ning Ma, Steven Cole, Mohammed Ebrahim, Gizaw Desta, Abiro Tigabie Mersha, Bester Mudereri, Evelyne Kihiu, Christine Kreye and Hellen Peter

No 2357, IFPRI discussion papers from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

Abstract: Extensive prior research has demonstrated that reducing gender discrimination enhances women’s empowerment, promotes more inclusive livelihoods, increases agricultural productivity, and improves other development outcomes. This study aims to contribute to documenting and informing the measurement of gender attitudes that relate directly to reaching, benefiting, and empowering women through agricultural innovations. By analyzing data from 8,051 survey respondents across study sites in Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Rwanda, our findings emphasize both commonalities and differences in gender attitudes across different contexts. Furthermore, by including a survey-based experiment during data collection, we assess whether gender-attitude statements vary depending on whether they are presented in a positive frame (focusing on equality) or in a negative frame (focusing on inequality). On average, rural women and men respondents across all countries supported more than half of the gender-equality statements. Some gender-inequality attitudes persisted across the four countries but varied in magnitude and by location, age group, and specific statement or theme. Framing matters: respondents exposed to a positive framing supported 16 percent more gender-equality statements than those exposed to a negative framing. The study highlights two main implications. First, the findings indicate the importance of considering both restrictive attitudes and those that reflect gender-equality opportunities as being in the vanguard. Accordingly, gender-focused interventions should adopt strategies that challenge normative views of women as supporting rather than leading actors in agriculture and economic activities. Second, gender-attitude measures do not perfectly align with country-level gender-equality indicators or with empowerment at the intrahousehold level. They therefore capture a distinct dimension and merit their own indicators.

Keywords: agriculture; development; gender; livelihoods; women’s empowerment; Congo, Democratic Republic of; Ethiopia; Nigeria; Rwanda; Africa; Eastern Africa; West and Central Africa; Sub-Saharan Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-09-16
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-afr and nep-exp
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/176542

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fpr:ifprid:176542

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IFPRI discussion papers from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().