Governance of natural resources: Highlights, lessons learned, and priorities for One CGIAR

CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets

No 5, PIM flagship insights from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

Abstract: What are the drivers and consequences of tenure insecurity? PIM research under Flagship 5 addressed drivers and consequences of tenure insecurity from three angles: women’s rights, individual or household rights, and collective rights (where ownership or long-term use and/or management rights have been recognized or devolved to communities to some extent). Individual and household rights focus on agricultural land; collective rights on forests, rangelands, and water; and women’s rights consider the full range of resources.

Keywords: innovation; natural resources; gender; policies; households; stakeholders; capacity development; tenure security; multi-stakeholder processes; tenure insecurity; property rights; governance; women (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr and nep-env
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143955

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fpr:pimfis:5

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in PIM flagship insights from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().