Standard and Modified SST Models with the Consideration of the Streamline Curvature for Separated Flow Calculation in a Narrow Channel with a Conical Dimple on the Heated Wall

Sergey Isaev, Dmitry Nikushchenko, Alexandr Sudakov, Nikita Tryaskin, Ann Egorova, Leonid Iunakov, Alexandr Usachov and Valery Kharchenko
Additional contact information
Sergey Isaev: Research Department, Saint-Petersburg State Marine Technical University, Lotsmanskaya 3, 190121 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Dmitry Nikushchenko: Research Department, Saint-Petersburg State Marine Technical University, Lotsmanskaya 3, 190121 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Alexandr Sudakov: Research Department, Saint-Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation, Pilots Str. 38, 196210 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Nikita Tryaskin: Research Department, Saint-Petersburg State Marine Technical University, Lotsmanskaya 3, 190121 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Ann Egorova: Research Department, Saint-Petersburg State Marine Technical University, Lotsmanskaya 3, 190121 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Leonid Iunakov: Research Department, Baltic State Technical University, 1-a Krasnoarmejskaya 1, 190005 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Alexandr Usachov: Research Department, N.E. Zhukovskii Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute, Radio Str., 17, 107005 Moscow, Russia
Valery Kharchenko: Research Department, Saint-Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation, Pilots Str. 38, 196210 Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Energies, 2021, vol. 14, issue 16, 1-23

Abstract: The testing of the standard and modified SST models of the transfer of shear stresses was carried out on an example of calculating the heat transfer with an intense detached flow around a conical dimple with a slope angle of 45 ° on the heated wall of a narrow channel. It was shown that the standard turbulence model by Menter SST (MSST) of 2003, widely used in the packages Fluent, CFX, StarCCM+, etc., significantly underestimated the intensity of the return flow. A correction of this model was presented that took into account the influence of the curvature of streamlines within the framework of the Rodi-Leshziner-Isaev (RLI) approach for spatial separated flows. It was found that the predictions for the RLI MSST 2003 were close to the predictions for the original standard MSST 1993, in which the eddy viscosity was calculated using the vorticity modulus. At the same time, the predictions based on the modified one, following Smirnov-Menter (SM) MSST 2003, included in the ANSYS model catalog did not differ too much from the standard MSST 2003. The preference of the MSST modified within the RLI 2003 for calculating the heat transfer in intense separated flows was substantiated.

Keywords: vortex; heat; conical dimple; channel; simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/5038/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/5038/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:5038-:d:615839

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().