Comparison of Eddy Current Loss Calculation Techniques for Axial Flux Motors with Printed Circuit Board Windings

Andreas Bauer, Daniel Dieterich and Sven Urschel ()
Additional contact information
Andreas Bauer: Electrotechnical Systems of Mechatronics, Kaiserslautern University of Applied Sciences, Schoenstraße 11, 67659 Kaiserslautern, Germany
Daniel Dieterich: Electrotechnical Systems of Mechatronics, Kaiserslautern University of Applied Sciences, Schoenstraße 11, 67659 Kaiserslautern, Germany
Sven Urschel: Electrotechnical Systems of Mechatronics, Kaiserslautern University of Applied Sciences, Schoenstraße 11, 67659 Kaiserslautern, Germany

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 10, 1-18

Abstract: In slotless machines, the winding conductors are exposed to the magnetic air gap field, which causes additional eddy current losses, thus decreasing efficiency and affecting thermal utilization. This is the case, inter alia, for axial flux motors equipped with printed circuit board windings, where the winding is made of copper–fiberglass epoxy laminations and located in the air gap. The dominant influencing factors are primarily the width of the conducting tracks and the magnetic air gap flux density and frequency. The evaluation time is a crucial constraint when calculating thousands of different designs for design space exploration or performing multi-objective optimizations. Finite element simulations can achieve very precise results, but unlike semi-analytical approximation functions, they are very time-consuming and therefore not the method of choice for design space exploration. This publication provides a comprehensive overview of a selection of different eddy current loss calculation techniques that are applicable for rectangular tracks and round wire windings. A comparison of the calculated results for a finite element simulation is presented for a slotless axial flux machine with printed circuit board windings and rectangular tracks. The calculation time consumed is also compared. The current density distribution of planar conductors of air gap windings differs from that in electrical steel sheets. In contrast to the methods based on steel sheets, only the adapted methods for conductors in air gaps offer acceptable accuracy. A recommendation is provided for the method that offers the best balance between accuracy and computation time for the early-stage design of slotless axial flux machines.

Keywords: eddy current losses; PCB winding; axial flux machine; motor winding; planar winding; slotless machine; design space exploration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2603/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2603/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2603-:d:1658244

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().