A Data Protection Method for the Electricity Business Environment Based on Differential Privacy and Federal Incentive Mechanisms
Xu Zhou,
Hongshan Luo,
Simin Chen and
Yuling He ()
Additional contact information
Xu Zhou: Shenzhen Power Supply Bureau Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518048, China
Hongshan Luo: Shenzhen Power Supply Bureau Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518048, China
Simin Chen: Shenzhen Power Supply Bureau Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518048, China
Yuling He: Department of Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 13, 1-28
Abstract:
In the development process of the power industry, accurately assessing the level of development of the electricity business environment is of great significance. However, traditional evaluation systems have limitations, with the issue of “data silos” being prominent, and user privacy under federated learning is also at risk. This paper proposes a federated learning-based data protection method for the electricity business environment to address these challenges. Based on the World Bank’s B-READY framework, this paper constructs an electricity business environment evaluation system containing nine indicators, focusing on three aspects: electricity regulations, public services, and operational efficiency. The indicators are weighted using the Sequence Relation and Entropy Weight Method. To address the issue of sensitive data protection, we first use federated learning technology to build a distributed modeling framework, ensuring that raw data never leaves the local environment during the collaborative modeling process. Next, we embed a differential privacy mechanism in the model parameter transmission stage, encrypting the model parameters by adding controlled noise. Finally, an incentive mechanism based on contribution quantification is implemented to encourage participation from all parties. This paper conducts experiments using the data of Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province. Compared with the FNN model and the SVR model, the MLP model reduces MAE by 78.9% and 94.12%, respectively, and increases R 2 by 37.95% and 55.62%, respectively. The superiority of the method proposed in this paper has been proved.
Keywords: electricity business environment; differential privacy; federated learning; data protection; combined weighting or composite weighting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3403/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3403/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3403-:d:1689547
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Agatha Cao
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().