Power System Decision Making in the Age of Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Review

Yeji Lim, Minjae Son, Kyungnam Park, Minsoo Kim, Keunju Song, Haejoong Lee and Hongseok Kim ()
Additional contact information
Yeji Lim: Department of Electronic Engineering, Sogang University, Baekbeom-ro 35, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04107, Republic of Korea
Minjae Son: Department of Electronic Engineering, Sogang University, Baekbeom-ro 35, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04107, Republic of Korea
Kyungnam Park: Department of Electronic Engineering, Sogang University, Baekbeom-ro 35, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04107, Republic of Korea
Minsoo Kim: Department of Energy Engineering, Korea Institute of Energy Technology, 111, Guseong-ro, Naju-si 58330, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea
Keunju Song: Department of Electronic Engineering, Sogang University, Baekbeom-ro 35, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04107, Republic of Korea
Haejoong Lee: Department of Electronic Engineering, Sogang University, Baekbeom-ro 35, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04107, Republic of Korea
Hongseok Kim: Department of Electronic Engineering, Sogang University, Baekbeom-ro 35, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04107, Republic of Korea

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 18, 1-49

Abstract: Modern power systems are facing growing complexity and uncertainty due to electrification, large-scale renewable integration, and evolving consumption behaviors. These changes have pushed traditional numerical optimization methods to their practical limits in terms of scalability and real-time applicability. In response, deep learning approaches that offer fast inference and robustness to uncertainty are gaining significant attention. This paper presents, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic review from a functional perspective of deep learning research supporting power system decision making. Taking a functional perspective, we classify neural networks into three core roles: learning to predict, learning to surrogate, and learning to optimize. In the first role, neural networks forecast exogenous uncertainties serving as the instance input to operational optimization problems. In the second role, they approximate complex physical constraints, enabling the efficient formulation of problems that would otherwise be analytically intractable. In the third role, neural networks act as learning-based optimizers that either replace or augment conventional solvers. The core purpose of this paper is to emphasize that neural networks should not simply be regarded as generic data-driven tools, but rather as models serving distinct functional roles—each with its own objectives and considerations. In this regard, we introduce diverse approaches aligned with these roles, offering conceptual foundations for principled application in practice. Such functional insights will ultimately guide the design of modular and hybrid architectures that integrate these roles, which in turn may provide the basis for developing domain-specific foundation models for power system operations.

Keywords: power system operation; optimal power flow; economic dispatch; unit commitment; probabilistic forecasting; decision-focused learning; surrogate model; learning to optimize; physics-informed (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/4867/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/4867/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:4867-:d:1748522

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Cassie Shen

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().