Green Growth’s Unintended Burden: The Distributional and Well-Being Impacts of China’s Energy Transition

Li Liu and Jichuan Sheng ()
Additional contact information
Li Liu: School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Jichuan Sheng: Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 20, 1-18

Abstract: Achieving environmentally sustainable growth is a core challenge for developing economies, yet the welfare consequences of green development policies for vulnerable populations remain understudied. This article investigates the distributional impacts of one of the world’s largest development interventions: China’s energy transition. By integrating provincial-level energy metrics with a decade-long household panel survey (CFPS), we employ a fixed-effects model to provide a holistic assessment of the policy’s effects on household well-being. The analysis reveals a stark trade-off: a 10% increase in clean energy adoption generates significant non-monetary well-being gains, equivalent to a 190,000 CNY annual income rise, primarily through improved environmental quality and cleaner cooking fuel access. However, these benefits are partially offset by rising energy costs. Our heterogeneity analysis reveals a clear regressive burden: the transition significantly increases energy expenditures for rural and low-income households, while having a negligible or even cost-reducing effect on their urban and high-income counterparts. Our findings demonstrate that while the energy transition promotes aggregate welfare, its benefits are unevenly distributed, potentially exacerbating energy poverty and inequality. This underscores a critical development challenge: green growth is not automatically inclusive. We argue that for the energy transition to be truly pro-poor, it must be accompanied by robust social protection mechanisms, such as targeted subsidies, to shield the most vulnerable from the adverse economic shocks of the policy.

Keywords: energy transition; well-being; poverty; inequality; development policy; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5367/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5367/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5367-:d:1769221

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Cassie Shen

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().