Polarity-Dependent DC Dielectric Behavior of Virgin XLPO, XLPE, and PVC Cable Insulations
Khomsan Ruangwong (),
Norasage Pattanadech () and
Pittaya Pannil
Additional contact information
Khomsan Ruangwong: Electrical Engineering Department, School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology, Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
Norasage Pattanadech: Electrical Engineering Department, School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology, Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
Pittaya Pannil: Instrumentation and Control Engineering Department, School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology, Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 20, 1-23
Abstract:
Reliable DC cable insulation is crucial for photovoltaic (PV) systems and high-voltage DC (HVDC) networks. However, conventional materials such as cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) face challenges under prolonged DC stress—notably space charge buildup, dielectric losses, and thermal aging. Cross-linked polyolefin (XLPO) has emerged as a halogen-free, thermally stable alternative, but its comparative DC performance remains underreported. Methods: We evaluated the insulations of virgin XLPO, XLPE, and PVC PV cables under ±1 kV DC using time-domain indices (IR, DAR, PI, Loss Index), supported by MATLAB and FTIR. Multi-layer cable geometries were modeled in MATLAB to simulate radial electric field distribution, and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was employed to reveal polymer chemistry and functional groups. Results: XLPO exhibited an IR on the order of 10 8 –10 9 Ω, and XLPE (IR ~ 10 8 Ω) and PVC (IR ~ 10 7 Ω, LI ≥ 1) at 60 s, with favorable polarization indices under both polarities. Notably, they showed high insulation resistance and low-to-moderate loss indices (≈1.3–1.5) under both polarities, indicating controlled relaxation with limited conduction contribution. XLPE showed good initial insulation resistance but revealed polarity-dependent relaxation and higher loss (especially under positive bias) due to trap-forming cross-linking byproducts. PVC had the lowest resistance (GΩ-range) and near-unit DAR/PI, dominated by leakage conduction and dielectric losses. Simulations confirmed a uniform electric field in XLPO insulation with no polarity asymmetry, while FTIR spectra linked XLPO’s low polarity and PVC’s chlorine content to their electrical behavior. Conclusions: XLPO outperforms XLPE and PVC in resisting DC leakage, charge trapping, and thermal stress, underscoring its suitability for long-term PV and HVDC applications. This study provides a comprehensive structure–property understanding to guide the selection of advanced, polarity-resilient cable insulation materials.
Keywords: XLPO; XLPE; PVC; dielectric properties; FTIR spectroscopy; space charge (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5404/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5404/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5404-:d:1770774
Access Statistics for this article
Energies is currently edited by Ms. Cassie Shen
More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().