A Loser Can Be a Winner: Comparison of Two Instance-based Learning Models in a Market Entry Competition

Cleotilde Gonzalez, Varun Dutt and Tomás Lejarraga
Additional contact information
Cleotilde Gonzalez: Dynamic Decision Making Laboratory, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
Varun Dutt: Dynamic Decision Making Laboratory, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
Tomás Lejarraga: Dynamic Decision Making Laboratory, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA

Games, 2011, vol. 2, issue 1, 1-27

Abstract: This paper presents a case of parsimony and generalization in model comparisons. We submitted two versions of the same cognitive model to the Market Entry Competition (MEC), which involved four-person and two-alternative (enter or stay out) games. Our model was designed according to the Instance-Based Learning Theory (IBLT). The two versions of the model assumed the same cognitive principles of decision making and learning in the MEC. The only difference between the two models was the assumption of homogeneity among the four participants: one model assumed homogeneous participants (IBL-same) while the other model assumed heterogeneous participants (IBL-different). The IBL-same model involved three free parameters in total while the IBL-different involved 12 free parameters, i.e. , three free parameters for each of the four participants. The IBL-different model outperformed the IBL-same model in the competition, but after exposing the models to a more challenging generalization test (the Technion Prediction Tournament), the IBL-same model outperformed the IBL-different model. Thus, a loser can be a winner depending on the generalization conditions used to compare models. We describe the models and the process by which we reach these conclusions.

Keywords: instance-based learning theory; model comparison; generalization; parsimony (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C C7 C70 C71 C72 C73 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/2/1/136/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/2/1/136/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jgames:v:2:y:2011:i:1:p:136-162:d:11718

Access Statistics for this article

Games is currently edited by Ms. Susie Huang

More articles in Games from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().