EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How to Achieve a Healthier and More Sustainable Europe by 2040 According to the Public? Results of a Five-Country Questionnaire Survey

Iva Zverinova, Vojtěch Máca, Milan Ščasný (), Rosa Strube, Sibila Marques, Diana Dubová, Martin Kryl, Daniela Craveiro, Timothy Taylor, Aline Chiabai and Silvestre García de Jalón
Additional contact information
Vojtěch Máca: Environment Centre, Charles University, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic
Rosa Strube: Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production, 42107 Wuppertal, Germany
Sibila Marques: Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IUL, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal
Diana Dubová: Environment Centre, Charles University, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic
Martin Kryl: Environment Centre, Charles University, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic
Daniela Craveiro: Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IUL, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal
Timothy Taylor: European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro TR1 3HD, UK
Aline Chiabai: Basque Centre for Climate Change, Biscaya, 48004 Pais Vasco, Spain
Silvestre García de Jalón: Basque Centre for Climate Change, Biscaya, 48004 Pais Vasco, Spain

IJERPH, 2020, vol. 17, issue 17, 1-23

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to understand public preferences for several future scenarios of achieving a healthier, more equitable and sustainable Europe, which differ in the way the society is organized (individualistically vs. collectively) and in the driving sector (public vs. private). To achieve this aim, we conducted a questionnaire survey using representative samples for five European countries in 2018. About three thousand respondents chose among the four scenarios presented within four different contexts (green spaces, active mobility, energy-efficient housing, food consumption) or none of them. A majority of people in the five European countries were ready to accept one of the scenarios. We found significant differences in preferences according to socioeconomic backgrounds and values of respondents. People above 35 years old, those who were less educated, and those in the lowest household income tertile were less supportive of all scenarios. The heterogeneity in preferences associated with differences in socioeconomic backgrounds was larger for the scenario in which society is organized individualistically and driven by the private sector. Smaller distinctions were found in case of the scenario in which society is organized collectively and is driven by the public sector. Departing from social psychological theories, we examine the role of altruistic, biospheric, egoistic, hedonic, and security values. People with stronger biospheric values were more likely to accept scenarios, particularly those which are driven by the public sector and where there is more collective organisation. Those with a more egoistic value orientation were more likely to have higher preferences for scenarios where the private sector had a dominant role. The policy implications, in terms of the selection and framing of policy measures to enhance public support, are discussed.

Keywords: future scenarios; public health; sustainability; equity; green spaces; active mobility; housing; food consumption; values; public acceptability; policy support (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6071/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6071/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6071-:d:401750

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6071-:d:401750