Assessing Compliance with Evolving Exposure Standards: Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS) Exposure in Western Australian Mining

Adelle Liebenberg, Kiam Padamsey, Kerry Staples, Matthew Oosthuizen, Marcus Cattani, Andy McCarthy and Jacques Oosthuizen ()
Additional contact information
Adelle Liebenberg: School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6028, Australia
Kiam Padamsey: School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6028, Australia
Kerry Staples: Department of Health (Western Australia), Epidemiology Directorate, Perth 6004, Australia
Matthew Oosthuizen: School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6028, Australia
Marcus Cattani: School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6028, Australia
Andy McCarthy: School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6028, Australia
Jacques Oosthuizen: School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6028, Australia

IJERPH, 2025, vol. 22, issue 10, 1-8

Abstract: The link between occupational exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS) and silicosis, a potentially fatal respiratory disease, has been well-established, leading to global reductions in RCS Exposure Standards (ES). In Western Australia (WA), RCS data have been collected by the Department of Energy, Mining, Industry Regulation and Safety (DEMIRS) from 1986 to 2024 ( n = 144,141). These results were analysed to assess the impacts of recent changes to the ES on compliance. Findings suggest that the WA mining sector, regardless of commodity type, is compliant with RCS exposures as assessed against the 0.05 mg/m 3 ES (2019). Laboratory technicians, exploratory drilling, miscellaneous trades/utilities, trades assistant, sample preparation, and sampler/sample operator are SEGS that had the highest RCS exposures. Exposure assessment did not account for the protection provided by respiratory protective equipment (RPE). In the WA mining sector, a robust respiratory protection regime is enforced that includes respirator fit testing, and this is most likely the case throughout Australia. On the balance of epidemiological evidence, industry compliance over decades, reducing exposure profiles, and robust RPE programmes, it could be argued that further reductions to the RCS exposure standard are not justified. Regulators need to consider the protection provided by respirators in exposure assessment.

Keywords: respirable crystalline silica; workplace exposure standards; lung disease; mining (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/10/1567/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/10/1567/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:10:p:1567-:d:1771700

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().