A Community-Based Assessment of Attitudes, Health Impacts and Protective Actions During the 24-Day Hangar Fire in Tustin, California

Shahir Masri (), Alana M. W. LeBrón, Annie Zhang, Lisa B. Jones, Oladele A. Ogunseitan and Jun Wu ()
Additional contact information
Shahir Masri: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Joe C. Wen School of Population & Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
Alana M. W. LeBrón: Department of Health, Society, and Behavior, Joe C. Wen School of Population & Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92617, USA
Annie Zhang: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Joe C. Wen School of Population & Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
Lisa B. Jones: Institute for Clinical & Translational Science, The University of California, Irvine, CA 92617, USA
Oladele A. Ogunseitan: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Joe C. Wen School of Population & Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
Jun Wu: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Joe C. Wen School of Population & Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA

IJERPH, 2025, vol. 22, issue 7, 1-24

Abstract: Fire events can impact physical and mental health through smoke exposure, evacuation, property loss, and/or other environmental stressors. In this study, we developed community-driven, cross-sectional online surveys to assess public attitudes, health impacts, and protective actions of residents affected by the Tustin hangar fire that burned for 24 days in southern California. Results showed the most frequently reported fire-related exposure concerns (93%) to be asbestos and general air pollution and the most commonly reported mental health impacts to be anxiety (41%), physical fatigue (37%), headaches (33%), and stress (26%). Nose/sinus irritation was the most commonly reported (26.0%) respiratory symptom, while skin- and eye-related conditions were reported by 63.0% and 72.2% of the survey population, respectively. The most commonly reported health-protective actions taken by residents included staying indoors and/or closing doors and windows (67%), followed by wearing face masks (37%) and the indoor use of air purifiers (35%). A higher proportion of low-income residents had to spend money on remediation or other health-protective actions compared to high-income residents. Participants overwhelmingly reported disapproval of their city’s and/or government’s response to the fire disaster. Findings from this study underscore the potential impacts of major pollution events on neighboring communities and offer critical insights to better position government agencies to respond during future disasters while effectively communicating with the public and addressing community needs.

Keywords: structure fire; survey; air pollution; Tustin hangar fire (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/7/1003/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/7/1003/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:7:p:1003-:d:1687622

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().