A Novel Rubric for Rating the Quality of Retraction Notices

Emma Bilbrey, Natalie O'Dell and Jonathan Creamer
Additional contact information
Emma Bilbrey: School for Science and Math at Vanderbilt, C-1320 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
Natalie O'Dell: School for Science and Math at Vanderbilt, C-1320 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
Jonathan Creamer: School for Science and Math at Vanderbilt, C-1320 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232, USA

Publications, 2014, vol. 2, issue 1, 1-13

Abstract: When a scientific article is found to be either fraudulent or erroneous, one course of action available to both the authors and the publisher is to retract said article. Unfortunately, not all retraction notices properly inform the reader of the problems with a retracted article. This study developed a novel rubric for rating and standardizing the quality of retraction notices, and used it to assess the retraction notices of 171 retracted articles from 15 journals. Results suggest the rubric to be a robust, if preliminary, tool. Analysis of the retraction notices suggest that their quality has not improved over the last 50 years, that it varies both between and within journals, and that it is dependent on the field of science, the author of the retraction notice, and the reason for retraction. These results indicate a lack of uniformity in the retraction policies of individual journals and throughout the scientific literature. The rubric presented in this study could be adopted by journals to help standardize the writing of retraction notices.

Keywords: research ethics; scientific retraction; research misconduct (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A2 D83 L82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/2/1/14/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/2/1/14/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:14-26:d:32448

Access Statistics for this article

Publications is currently edited by Ms. Jennifer Zhang

More articles in Publications from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().