Cross-State Validation of a Tool Supporting Implementation of Rural Kinship Navigator Programs

Brianna Routh (), Christine McKibbin, David Wihry, Jennifer A. Crittenden, Ayomide Foluso and Jennifer Jain
Additional contact information
Brianna Routh: Extension and the Department of Food Systems, Nutrition, and Kinesiology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
Christine McKibbin: Department of Psychology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA
David Wihry: Center on Aging, University of Maine, Bangor, ME 04401, USA
Jennifer A. Crittenden: School of Social Work, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5770, USA
Ayomide Foluso: Human Development and Community Health, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59715, USA
Jennifer Jain: Center on Aging, University of Maine, Bangor, ME 04401, USA

Societies, 2024, vol. 14, issue 9, 1-14

Abstract: While kinship care is prevalent and preferred over out-of-family care, there are relatively few measurement tools validated for use with this audience. The Title IV-E Clearinghouse, used to rate Families First Prevention Services such as Kinship Navigator Programs, requires valid tools. Such families face a myriad of needs in supporting children in their care. Previous research has established the significant challenges faced by rural families. Accurate assessment of these needs, particularly for rural families, is an essential component of kinship navigation services. In this study, we examined the face validity of the Family Needs Scale for use with kinship caregivers in rural programs. Methods: The evaluation teams with each respective kinship program conducted four virtual focus groups comprising kinship caregivers ( n = 18) in three rural states. Participants were recruited from outside an ongoing Kinship Navigator Program Evaluation sample but had previously received program support as kinship caregivers. All states received IRB approval from their respective universities. Verbal consent was obtained at the time of the focus group. Focus groups lasted approximately 60–90 min and participants received a gift card incentive. Data were transcribed and qualitatively coded by question set and individual questions to identify phenomenological trends. Findings: Across four focus groups, we found four themes: (1) Broad agreement regarding the face validity of most assessment items; (2) Lack of clarity and shared understanding of several terms used within the tool, (3) Responses change with Ages and Stages of kinship family, and (4) Perspective considerations varying when completing the assessment. Discussion: Findings indicate that most assessment items had strong face validity, where there are a few opportunities to clarify key concepts relevant to rural kinship families and assess additional needs to understand the situational scope of the kinship experience. Overall, the needs assessment tool appears to have validity in assessing current kinship needs and outcomes within Kinship Navigator program evaluation.

Keywords: kinship; rural; resource (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A13 A14 P P0 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 Z1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/9/178/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/9/178/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:178-:d:1476047

Access Statistics for this article

Societies is currently edited by Ms. Farrah Sun

More articles in Societies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().