The Socio-Political Debate of Dying Today in the United Kingdom and New Zealand: ‘Letting Go’ of the Biomedical Model of Care in Order to Develop a Contemporary Ars Moriendi
Rhona Winnington,
Eleanor Holroyd and
Shelaine Zambas
Additional contact information
Rhona Winnington: School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health & Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK
Eleanor Holroyd: School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Shelaine Zambas: School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Societies, 2018, vol. 8, issue 3, 1-11
Abstract:
Death is a reality of life. Despite this inevitability, death today remains unwelcome and has been sequestered into the enclaves of medical practice as a means of quelling the rising tide of fear it provokes. Medical practice currently maintains power over the dying individual, actualised through the selective collaboration between medicine and law as a means of subverting the individual who attempts to disrupt the contemporary accepted norms of dying. There is, however, a shift on the horizon as to whether we can make the notion of a true choice become a reality in New Zealand. This serves to offer a compelling movement towards individuals seeking control of their dying trajectory to actualise the notion of individual choice. With this shifting landscape there is an opportunity to be grasped to change how we manage our dying trajectory away from the biomedical patterns of behaviour when dying, in order to balance life decisions. To achieve this prospect, we need to engage with a framework upon which to pin the changes. This paper offers a re-framing and re-presenting approach, using illustrative examples that draw upon British and New Zealand literature, together with over 50 years of professional nursing, and the Ars Moriendi to reflect upon the self-centricity of the contemporary Western individual to access a ‘good death’ of choice.
Keywords: end-of-life; palliative care; patient choice; death; dying; right-to-die; Ars Moriendi; medical power; euthanasia; assisted dying (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A13 A14 P P0 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 Z1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/8/3/65/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/8/3/65/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:65-:d:163051
Access Statistics for this article
Societies is currently edited by Ms. Farrah Sun
More articles in Societies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().