EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are Renewables as Friendly to Humans as to the Environment?: A Social Life Cycle Assessment of Renewable Electricity

Shutaro Takeda, Alexander Ryota Keeley, Shigeki Sakurai, Shunsuke Managi and Catherine Benoît Norris
Additional contact information
Shutaro Takeda: Graduate School of Advanced Integrated Studies in Human Survivability, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8306, Japan
Alexander Ryota Keeley: Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
Shigeki Sakurai: Graduate School of Advanced Integrated Studies in Human Survivability, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8306, Japan
Catherine Benoît Norris: Extension School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 5, 1-16

Abstract: The adoption of renewable energy technologies in developing nations is recognized to have positive environmental impacts; however, what are their effects on the electricity supply chain workers? This article provides a quantitative analysis on this question through a relatively new framework called social life cycle assessment, taking Malaysia as a case example. Impact assessments by the authors show that electricity from renewables has greater adverse impacts on supply chain workers than the conventional electricity mix: Electricity production with biomass requires 127% longer labor hours per unit-electricity under the risk of human rights violations, while the solar photovoltaic requires 95% longer labor hours per unit-electricity. However, our assessment also indicates that renewables have less impacts per dollar-spent. In fact, the impact of solar photovoltaic would be 60% less than the conventional mix when it attains grid parity. The answer of “ are renewables as friendly to humans as to the environment? ” is “ not-yet, but eventually .”

Keywords: renewable energy; supply chain; social responsibility; social life cycle assessment; labor conditions; Malaysia; solar PV; Biomass; Hydro (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1370/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1370/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1370-:d:211207

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1370-:d:211207