EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Communicating Climate Change Risk: A Content Analysis of IPCC’s Summary for Policymakers

P. Marijn Poortvliet, Meredith T. Niles, Jeroen A. Veraart, Saskia E. Werners, Fiona C. Korporaal and Bob C. Mulder
Additional contact information
P. Marijn Poortvliet: Strategic Communication Group, Wageningen University, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands
Meredith T. Niles: Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences & Food Systems Program, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
Jeroen A. Veraart: Wageningen Environmental Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Saskia E. Werners: Wageningen Environmental Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Fiona C. Korporaal: Strategic Communication Group, Wageningen University, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands
Bob C. Mulder: Strategic Communication Group, Wageningen University, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 12, 1-14

Abstract: This study investigated the effectiveness of climate change risk communication in terms of its theoretical potential to stimulate recipients’ awareness and behavioral change. We selected the summary for policy makers (SPM) of the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report in order to conduct a content analysis; the extended parallel process model and construal level theory served as conceptual lenses to perform the analysis. Specifically, we evaluated to what extent the SPM included informational elements of threat, efficacy and psychological distance related to climate change. The results showed that threat information was prominently present, but efficacy information was less frequently included, and when it was, more often in the latter parts of the SPM. With respect to construal level it was found that in the IPCC report concrete representations were used only sparingly. Theoretical relevance and implications for climate change risk communication with key audiences are discussed.

Keywords: climate change; risk communication; psychological distance; threat appraisal; efficacy; global warming; content analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4861/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4861/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4861-:d:371533

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4861-:d:371533