EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Urban Demolition: Application of Blight Elimination Programs and Flood Buyout Programs to the Italian Case

Simone Rusci, Diego Altafini and Valerio Di Pinto
Additional contact information
Simone Rusci: Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Energia, dei Sistemi, del Territorio e delle Costruzioni, DESTeC, Università di Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
Diego Altafini: Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Energia, dei Sistemi, del Territorio e delle Costruzioni, DESTeC, Università di Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
Valerio Di Pinto: Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Edile e Ambientale, Università di Napoli Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 16, 1-21

Abstract: In recent years, there has been a growing awareness that not all decommissioned and obsolete real-estate assets can be recovered and reused. After the paradigm of urban growth, and following the paradigm of regeneration, a new paradigm seems to be looming on the horizon: the paradigm of shrinkage. Due to this change in perspective, discussions on the potential of demolition policies as an alternative to regeneration and reuse are gaining support in the debate about urban growth. In the United States, there are two on-going programs using demolition as their main tool for urban planning: the blight elimination programs and the flood buyout programs. The former foresees the demolition of abandoned and decayed real-estate assets, while the latter envisions the demolition and relocation of buildings within areas under flooding risks. Given their successful employment in the U.S., this paper evaluates the applicability of these programs to an Italian case, which is characterized by a different building heritage and different territorial conditions. Simulations of the programs’ application are made using two case studies: Lecce nei Marsi (Abruzzo) and Moncalieri (Piemonte). The results demonstrate the substantial feasibility of the blight elimination programs’ usage in Italy, while the flood buyout programs instead demonstrates major obstacles that may hinder its successful application.

Keywords: urban demolition; contraction; real-estate; landscape (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9412/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9412/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9412-:d:619268

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9412-:d:619268