Shifting the Balance among the ‘Three Rs of Sustainability:’ What Motivates Reducing and Reusing?

Carrie M. Leslie, Alva I. Strand, Elizabeth A. Ross, Giovanni Tolentino Ramos, Eli S. Bridge, Phillip B. Chilson and Christopher E. Anderson
Additional contact information
Carrie M. Leslie: Sociology Department, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
Alva I. Strand: Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
Elizabeth A. Ross: Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
Giovanni Tolentino Ramos: Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
Eli S. Bridge: Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
Phillip B. Chilson: School of Meteorology & Atmospheric Radar Research, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
Christopher E. Anderson: Communication Department, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 18, 1-12

Abstract: The “Three Rs of Sustainability—Reduce, Reuse, Recycle,” are central tenets of many community waste-management programs promoting responsible use of natural resources and ecosystem services. Over the past few decades, recycling has become widespread, but monetary and energy expenditures required to transport and transform waste materials have led to downsizing of recycling programs globally and in the U.S. This trend increases the need for effective reducing and reusing practices as alternatives to recycling. Using a survey experiment to examine motivations that underlie reducing and reusing behaviors, individuals reported their current reducing, reusing, and recycling practices. Respondents then were provided with three hypothetical scenarios that described (1) an external waste-management threat to public well-being, (2) social/peer pressure from family and friends towards sustainable decision-making, and (3) increased convenience of reusing and reducing practices. These messages reflect previously identified RRR motivations. After the scenarios, the questions regarding recycling, reducing, and reusing behavior were presented again to test for changes in the responses. All three scenarios were effective in increasing intended reducing and reusing behavior. The threat scenario was slightly more effective than the others, particularly among individuals who reported behavior with considerable recycling practices but not as much reducing and reusing.

Keywords: reducing, reusing, recycling; environmental behaviors; sustainability; waste management behavior; socio-environmental (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10093/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10093/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10093-:d:632018

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().