Using Phase Change Materials (PCMs) in a Hot and Humid Climate to Reduce Heat Gain and Energy Consumption

Mohammad S. Bagazi, Ammar A. Melaibari, Ahmed B. Khoshaim, Nidal H. Abu-Hamdeh, Abdulmohsen O. Alsaiari and Hani Abulkhair
Additional contact information
Mohammad S. Bagazi: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Ammar A. Melaibari: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Ahmed B. Khoshaim: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Nidal H. Abu-Hamdeh: Center of Research Excellence in Renewable Energy and Power Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Abdulmohsen O. Alsaiari: Centre of Excellence in Desalination Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Hani Abulkhair: Centre of Excellence in Desalination Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 19, 1-17

Abstract: Twenty percent of the world’s energy is consumed by the construction sector, including commercial and residential buildings, where 13% is consumed by the residential sector only. Half of the total energy consumed by buildings in Saudi Arabia is specifically attributed to the hot summer season, which, unlike in many other countries in the Middle East, continues for more than 5 months annually. The use of a phase change material (PCM), as an insulator in building materials, can be a solution to provide a comfortable indoor temperature and reduce energy consumption. This study examined two different melting ranges for PCMs RT35 and RT35HC inserted into hollow clay bricks to investigate their thermal behavior and heat storage capacity and compare them with polystyrene foam. To perform this experiment, four chambers were constructed using cement plastering. The data were collected at Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, from mid-November 2020 to the end of February 2021. When the highest temperature was reached during the experiment, PCM RT35 provided a better cooling effect by 13% compared to 24% and 28.56% for PCM RT35HC and foam, respectively, compared to hollow bricks alone. However, when the lowest temperature was reached during the experiment, PCM RT35HC performed better than the other chambers in saving energy and keeping the chamber warm, which was 9.5% for the reference chamber, 7.0% for the foam chamber, and 2.8% for PCM RT35. The maximum energy saving of PCM RT35 was around 1920 kJ, which is around 0.533 kWh, for one wall only, and for PCM RT35HC, it was 2880 kJ, or 0.8 kWh, which can reduce energy consumption of the HVAC system by 97 kWh/m 2 and 146 kWh/m 2 per year, respectively.

Keywords: phase change material (PCM); hollow bricks; thermal behavior; latent heat; thermal comfort (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10965/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10965/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10965-:d:648972

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().