The Impact of Cost-of-Production Insurance on Input Expense of Fruit Growing in Ecologically Vulnerable Areas: Evidence from Shaanxi Province of China

Tao Li, Lihong Chen, Xiaoxu Li, Sha Li, Haibing Chen and Hao Ji
Additional contact information
Tao Li: College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China
Lihong Chen: College of Life Science, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China
Xiaoxu Li: College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China
Sha Li: Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, San Diego, CA 92037, USA
Haibing Chen: College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China
Hao Ji: College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 21, 1-14

Abstract: Planting fruit trees in ecologically vulnerable areas is an effective approach to achieving the goal of ecological protection and improving farmers’ livelihoods. However, in ecologically vulnerable areas, farmers still face agricultural production risks such as natural disasters, diseases, and pests. In order to help fruit growers avoid these risks and ensure the sustainability of their livelihoods, the Chinese government has launched cost-of-production (COP) insurance in these areas. Although previous studies have shown that the purchase of revenue- or yield-based crop insurance will change insured farmers’ input expense of chemicals in agricultural production, the existing literature lacksa discussion on how COP insurance affects the input expense of chemicals in fruit growing. Here, we address the existing research gap from both theoretical and empirical aspects by conducting surveys in 1051 households of fruit growers in the Shaanxi province of China. Theoretical deduction reveals that the COP insurance on input expenditure of chemicals can have an increasing effect. Using the 2SLS model and empirical analysis, we found that the insured fruit growers spent more on using chemical fertilizers and pesticides compared to non-insured fruit growers. These findings demonstrate that the COP insurance’s positive marginal incentive to apply more input expense of chemicals in production dominates the negative moral hazard effect.

Keywords: cost-of-production insurance; input expense; sustainability of fruit grower’ livelihood (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12083/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12083/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12083-:d:670176

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().