EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Multi-Scale Evaluation of Dominant Factors (MSDF) on Forage: An Ecosystemic Method to Understand the Function of Forage

Shanning Lou, Jiao Ning, Cheng Zhang, Chunmei Wang, Wanhe Zhu, Shenghua Chang and Fujiang Hou
Additional contact information
Shanning Lou: College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China
Jiao Ning: College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China
Cheng Zhang: College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China
Chunmei Wang: College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China
Wanhe Zhu: College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China
Shenghua Chang: College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China
Fujiang Hou: College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 4, 1-13

Abstract: Grassland agroecosystem plays a key role on resource cycling and sustainability of global ecosystem. Forage is the basic factor and core of the grassland agroecosystem. At a single scale, the most of forage evaluation remain in a state of qualitative or quantitative evaluation, and lack a series of quantitative evaluation at multi spatial scales and influence of society, environment and economy. This study collected dominant indicators at micro, plot, farm, ecoregional and macro scales to compile a systemic evaluation of forage in agroecosystems. A case study is presented for forage evaluation by using plot, farm, and regional data from an arid region of Gansu, China. Multi-scale evaluation of dominant factors (MSDF) was used to aggregate forage evaluation indicators. Results showed that the scale of evaluation had significant effects on the results of the evaluation. The evaluation results of the single index for the same forage species among plot, farm and ecoregional scales were different. Results implied that forage MSDF are needed to guide the evaluation of forage and then production of forage and herbivore in the future. An appropriate scale of evaluation could be selected in term of the forage production objectives and moreover, MSDF evaluation of forage should be used to improve the environmental, social and productive evaluation of forage in a grassland agroecosystems.

Keywords: forage evaluation; forage quality; multi-scale; social effect; macro scale (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2163/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2163/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2163-:d:501032

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2163-:d:501032