Novel Fuzzy Composite Indicators for Locating a Logistics Platform under Sustainability Perspectives
Hana Ayadi,
Nadia Hamani,
Lyes Kermad and
Mounir Benaissa
Additional contact information
Hana Ayadi: IUT de Montreuil, University of Paris 8, 93100 Montreuil, France
Nadia Hamani: INSSET, University of Picardie Jules Verne, 02100 Saint Quentin, France
Lyes Kermad: IUT de Montreuil, University of Paris 8, 93100 Montreuil, France
Mounir Benaissa: ISGIS, University of Sfax, Sfax 3021, Tunisia
Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 7, 1-37
Abstract:
The purpose of this paper is to help decision-makers choose the location of a logistics platform with sustainability perspectives. This study presents a compensatory and partially compensatory approach to build composite indicators, using mainly fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods. In the first instance, the fuzzy full consistency method (F-FUCOM) was used to calculate the weight of the criteria and sub-criteria. In the second instance, two aggregation methods, namely the fuzzy multi-attribute ideal-real comparative analysis (F-MAIRCA) and the fuzzy preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (F-PROMETHEE), were used to rank the location of a logistics platform. The novelty of the work lays in studying the impact of limited sustainability and weak sustainability on the location of a logistics platform. In this respect, the aggregation of various sustainability criterion in fuzzy compensatory and partially compensatory composite indicators is an innovative and interesting approach used to locate a logistics platform. The obtained results show that economic sustainability is the most important criterion for the selection of a logistics platform, followed by the environmental criterion. Obviously, the F-MAIRCA and F-PROMETHEE methods provided the same ranking orders. Finally, sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the proposed approach.
Keywords: logistics platform; facility location selection; composite indicators; multi-criteria decision-making; F-FUCOM; F-PROMETHEE; F-MAIRCA; sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3891/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3891/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3891-:d:527973
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().