The Relevance of Recyclability for the Life Cycle Assessment of Packaging Based on Design for Life Cycle

Jonas Keller, Carla Scagnetti and Stefan Albrecht
Additional contact information
Jonas Keller: Department Life Cycle Engineering, Institute for Acoustic and Building Physics (IABP), University of Stuttgart, 70563 Stuttgart, Germany
Carla Scagnetti: Department Life Cycle Engineering, Institute for Acoustic and Building Physics (IABP), University of Stuttgart, 70563 Stuttgart, Germany
Stefan Albrecht: Department Life Cycle Engineering, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics IBP, 70563 Stuttgart, Germany

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 7, 1-13

Abstract: The awareness for more environmentally sustainable packaging solutions is steadily growing. With both consumers and manufacturers looking to minimize their impacts on the environment, the need for easy-to-implement and standardized measures strengthening a circular economy rises. In the research, the goal was to determine whether the carbon footprint and circularity of non-food plastic packaging can be improved by simple design changes. The results should then lead to design recommendations, providing a Design for Life Cycle approach. The methodology of the study was to conceptually design a single-use plastic packaging with attributes having positive and negative effects on recyclability. Herein, only design characteristics from products obtainable on the market were regarded. Moreover, a comparison over existing recyclability assessment methods is given. The recyclability was then determined with the selected approach by Cyclos HTP, and a reference calculation was conducted. Life Cycle Assessments were implemented for 14 packaging designs using the GaBi software and the Environmental Footprint method. The results showed that dark color, material compounds, insoluble adhesives, and large labels result in lower recyclability of the single-use packaging. The impacts on climate change range from 0.13 kg CO 2 -equivalent emissions (100% recyclability) to 0.21 kg CO 2 -equivalent emissions (0% recyclability) per packaging, showing that lower recyclability leads to a larger carbon footprint in all assessed scenarios. Concluding, the research demonstrated that by applying Design for Life Cycle measures, impacts on climate change can be reduced. Lastly, design recommendations for decision makers are outlined.

Keywords: Design for Life Cycle; circular economy; waste management; circular design; plastic packaging; producer responsibility; recyclability; climate change; life cycle assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4076/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4076/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4076-:d:782792

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().