Environmental Impacts of Specific Recyclates in European Battery Regulatory-Compliant Lithium-Ion Cell Manufacturing

Leonard Kurz (), Simeon Forster, Ralf Wörner and Frederik Reichert ()
Additional contact information
Leonard Kurz: Institute for Sustainable Energy Technology and Mobility (INEM), Esslingen–Esslingen University of Applied Sciences, Kanalstr. 33, 73728 Esslingen, Germany
Simeon Forster: Institute for Sustainable Energy Technology and Mobility (INEM), Esslingen–Esslingen University of Applied Sciences, Kanalstr. 33, 73728 Esslingen, Germany
Ralf Wörner: Institute for Sustainable Energy Technology and Mobility (INEM), Esslingen–Esslingen University of Applied Sciences, Kanalstr. 33, 73728 Esslingen, Germany
Frederik Reichert: Institute for Sustainable Energy Technology and Mobility (INEM), Esslingen–Esslingen University of Applied Sciences, Kanalstr. 33, 73728 Esslingen, Germany

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 15, issue 1, 1-16

Abstract: Since environmental benefits and supply chain resilience are commonly assumed for circular economy strategies, this study tests this hypothesis in the context of lithium-ion battery recycling and cell manufacturing. Therefore, the use of recyclates from different cathode active materials and from different recycling routes, namely hydrometallurgy and direct recycling, in a subsequent cell production is modelled with the recyclate quotas prescribed by the amended European Battery Regulation and analysed using life cycle assessment methodology. This study concludes that both, negative and positive environmental impacts can be achieved by the usage of recyclates, depended on the cell technology and the recycling process chosen. Newly constructed lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cells using a share of 11.3% of recyclates, which are obtained from LFP cells by a hydrometallurgical process, achieve a deterioration in the ecology by 7.5% for the global warming potential (GWP) compared to LFP cells without any recyclate share at all. For the same recyclate quota scenario, hydrometallurgical recyclates from lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide cells (NMC), on the other hand, achieve savings in GWP of up to 1.2%. Recyclates from direct recycling achieve savings in GWP for LPF and NMC of a maximum of 6.3% and 12.3%, by using a recyclate share of 20%. It can be seen that circular economy can raise large savings potentials ecologically, but can also have a contrary effect if not properly applied.

Keywords: circular economy; recycling; life cycle assessment; lithium-ion batteries; hydrometallurgy; direct recycling; cell manufacturing; European Union; Battery Regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/103/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/103/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:103-:d:1010521

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().