Farmer Households’ Livelihood Resilience in Ethnic Tourism Villages: A Case Study of the Wuling Mountain Area, China

Yuchun Xiao, Shuiliang Liu, Jinyou Zuo, Ningling Yin, Jilin Wu () and Wenhai Xie ()
Additional contact information
Yuchun Xiao: School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jishou University, Zhangjiajie 427000, China
Shuiliang Liu: College of Tourism, Jishou University, Zhangjiajie 427000, China
Jinyou Zuo: School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jishou University, Zhangjiajie 427000, China
Ningling Yin: School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jishou University, Zhangjiajie 427000, China
Jilin Wu: School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jishou University, Zhangjiajie 427000, China
Wenhai Xie: School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jishou University, Zhangjiajie 427000, China

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 15, issue 1, 1-19

Abstract: Farmer households in tourist villages have been severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the recovery of livelihood is proving difficult. In order to improve farmer households’ ability to cope with external shocks, we have applied the theoretical framework of resilience to study farmer households’ livelihood in ethnic tourism villages. Based on the survey data of 480 farmer households from 10 ethnic tourism villages in the Wuling Mountain area, this study constructs a livelihood resilience evaluation index system from three of the following dimensions: buffer capacity, adaptive capacity, and transformation capacity. These households are classified into three types: government-led, company-led, and community-led. In addition, the livelihood resilience and its influencing factors of each type is quantitatively assessed. The results show that the livelihood resilience of farmer households administered by the government, companies, and communities is 0.2984, 0.3250, and 0.2442, respectively. Government-led farmer households have the greatest transformation capacity, company-led farmer households have the largest buffer capacity and adaptive capacity, and community-led farmer households have the least capacity across the board. The results indicated that the company-led management of tourism development is currently the most appropriate mode of management for the local area. Four factors, namely, the number of family members engaged in tourism, the training opportunities for the development of professional skills, the education level of core family members, and the type of assistance subsidy available to a family, are the dominant obstacle factors with respect to the livelihood resilience of different types of farmer households. Finally, some recommendations are made to improve the farmer households’ livelihood resilience in ethnic tourism villages based on two aspects of organization management and farmer households’ behavior. The findings of this study can be used as a theoretical foundation for future research on farmer households’ resilience to poverty in underdeveloped ethnic tourism villages.

Keywords: ethnic tourism; farmer household; livelihood resilience; obstacle factors; Wuling Mountain area (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/662/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/662/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:662-:d:1020311

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().