Do Digital Trade Rules Matter? Empirical Evidence from TAPED
Tao Jiang,
Yizhu Hu (),
Fazli Haleem and
Shaolong Zeng
Additional contact information
Tao Jiang: School of Economic and Management, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
Yizhu Hu: School of Economic and Management, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
Fazli Haleem: Department of Management Sciences, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Sheringal 18200, Pakistan
Shaolong Zeng: School of Economics, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 11, 1-19
Abstract:
This study aims to examine (1) the impact of digital trade rules on digital services exports, (2) the heterogeneity of this impact in different trade categories, (3) the impact of digital trade rules on the growth of services exports through reducing trade costs, and (4) whether this impact is different in national income levels. In order to test the hypotheses, this study uses panel data from the TAPED database encompassing 143 economies between 2005 and 2019, employing a differences-in-differences model as the analytical framework. Our empirical results yield several key findings. Firstly, digital trade rules have a significant role in promoting the export of digital services. Secondly, the impact of trade rules on different types of trade and national income levels is significantly different. Thirdly, the mechanism analysis results show that trade costs have an intermediary role, and digital trade rules can promote the export of digital services by reducing trade costs. Finally, compared to “high-income countries”, the establishment of digital trade rules brings greater benefits to the digital services trade of low- and middle-income countries. Digital trade has brought significant changes to globalization development. Few studies address the role of digital trade rules in regulating the development of digital trade, and some researchers suggest reconstructing the global trade rules to meet the growth of digital trade. Nevertheless, research on how digital trade rules affect digital services exports is still sparse. This study contributes to the literature by revealing the importance of digital trade rules and provides a reference to promote institutional openness in the field of digital trade.
Keywords: digital trade rules; digital services export; trade costs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9074/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9074/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9074-:d:1163619
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().