Identifying Key Indicators for Monitoring Water Environmental Services Payment Programs—A Case Study in Brazil

Regina Marcia Longo, Joice Machado Garcia, Raissa Caroline Gomes () and Adélia Nobre Nunes
Additional contact information
Regina Marcia Longo: Postgraduate Program in Urban Infrastructure Systems, Polytechnic School, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas—PUC-Campinas, Campinas 13087-571, Brazil
Joice Machado Garcia: Postgraduate Program in Urban Infrastructure Systems, Polytechnic School, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas—PUC-Campinas, Campinas 13087-571, Brazil
Raissa Caroline Gomes: Postgraduate Program in Urban Infrastructure Systems, Polytechnic School, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas—PUC-Campinas, Campinas 13087-571, Brazil
Adélia Nobre Nunes: CEGOT—Centre for Studies in Geography and Spatial Planning, Department of Geography and Tourism, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 12, 1-18

Abstract: The recognition of the natural environment as an element that provides ecosystem services to society has led to an increased interest in the study of these services and the implementation of payment for environmental services (PES) initiatives. Although in recent years it has gained strength as an environmental conservation and restoration strategy, the PES instrument lacks something in the monitoring of its actions that inhibits its concrete efficiency, such as indicators that represent the study area. Based on the results of water, soil, and vegetation quality reported in a case study on a rural property participating in a PES-Water scheme in Brazil, the present study aimed to establish minimum water quality indicators relevant to the monitoring of PES-Water programs and propose a flowchart for monitoring actions and environmental aspects to support future projects of the same nature. Based on the results, the monitoring of these areas must involve the continuous checking of soil indicators, water and vegetation. In addition, details of the microclimate and socioeconomic conditions must be recorded. The results should also be systematized, disseminated, and made available in a monitoring system to serve the various actors involved, thereby facilitating the understanding of the PES instrument and the remuneration for the environmental services provided.

Keywords: environmental quality indicators; environmental monitoring; PES-Water; principal component analysis (PCA); water–soil–vegetation correlation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9593/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9593/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9593-:d:1171298

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().