EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Source Analysis Based on the Positive Matrix Factorization Models and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Agricultural Soil

Dejun Yang (), Yong Yang and Yipei Hua
Additional contact information
Dejun Yang: School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Yong Yang: School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Yipei Hua: School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 17, 1-17

Abstract: Soil heavy metal pollution is a severe and growing problem, and it is crucial to assess the level of soil heavy metal contamination and determine the origins of pollutants. However, there is limited research on soil heavy metal source apportionment and its carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic hazards. Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) is a powerful technique for source apportionment of pollutants in environmental matrices such as atmospheric particulate matter and soil, as it can handle missing and imprecise data to ensure data reliability, among other benefits. In order to explore the distribution characteristics and main sources of heavy metals in agricultural land, the contents of Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Ni were collected and determined. The positive matrix factorization (PMF) model was used to analyze the source of heavy metals in the soil in the study area, and the human health risk evaluation was carried out. The results showed that (1) the coefficient of variation of Cd in the four areas was much higher than that of the other four heavy metals, which showed strong variability; (2) the content and distribution of heavy metals in different regions were different under the influence of different environments; (3) the PMF model analysis showed that the heavy metal pollution sources in the four areas were divided into two types: the soil parent material, which had industrial pollution, traffic pollution, and agricultural pollution; and the contribution rate of each pollution source; (4) the non-carcinogenic risks of heavy metals in children at all points in the study area were greater than those of adults, and the carcinogenic risks were the opposite of the carcinogenic risk in the study area. And the most serious carcinogenic risk in the study area was the harm caused by oral ingestion of heavy metal Cr into the adults’ bodies.

Keywords: carcinogenic risk; human health risks; PMF model; source analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13225/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13225/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13225-:d:1232219

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13225-:d:1232219