A Comprehensive Assessment of Buildings for Post-Disaster Sustainable Reconstruction: A Case Study of Beirut Port

Josiana El Hage (), Isam Shahrour, Fadi Hage Chehade and Faten Abi Farraj
Additional contact information
Josiana El Hage: Laboratoire Génie Civil et Géo-Environnement, University of Lille, LGCgE, 59000 Lille, France
Isam Shahrour: Laboratoire Génie Civil et Géo-Environnement, University of Lille, LGCgE, 59000 Lille, France
Fadi Hage Chehade: Modeling Center, Doctoral School of Science and Technology, Lebanese University, Hadath 14-6513, Lebanon
Faten Abi Farraj: Advanced Construction Technology Services (ACTS), Beirut 14-5918, Lebanon

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 18, 1-25

Abstract: Natural and man-made disasters constitute a considerable threat to humans, especially when intertwined with complex geopolitical situations. Effective decision-making and management during post-disaster reconstruction projects should be based on an effective assessment of damages caused by disasters by considering social, economic, and environmental factors. An analysis of prior research on post-disaster assessment reveals a predominant focus on physical indicators. However, recognizing the crucial role of socio-economic factors in the post-disaster reconstruction process, this paper introduces a comprehensive methodology for evaluating disaster-related damages by considering both physical and socio-economic factors. The proposed method is initiated by identifying relevant physical and socio-economic indicators. These indicators are then synthesized based on the local context and experts’ opinions to derive the Physical Priority Index (PPI) and Socio-Economic Priority Index (SEPI). These indices subsequently guide the prioritization of reconstruction efforts, aligning with the decision-makers’ strategic vision. This method was employed to assess damages stemming from the Beirut port disaster, utilizing three physical indicators and nine socio-economic indicators. The examination of the PPI and SEPI of a major area of Beirut port did not unveil a straightforward correlation between these two indices. The low correlation between these indices increases the complexity of decision-making. However, given the profound socio-economic challenges in Lebanon, this paper recommends placing a higher emphasis on SEPI in the decision-making process. Nevertheless, stakeholders retain the flexibility to tailor their approach by combining PPI and SEPI indicators according to their policies. This adaptive approach ensures a nuanced and contextually relevant decision-making framework.

Keywords: priority index; buildings assessment; post-disaster reconstruction; Beirut Port Explosion; decision-making; sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13433/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13433/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13433-:d:1235274

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().