Evaluating the Technical, Economic, and Environmental Performance of Solar Water Heating System for Residential Applications–Comparison of Two Different Working Fluids (Water and Glycol)

Ephraim Bonah Agyekum (), Tahir Khan and Nimay Chandra Giri
Additional contact information
Ephraim Bonah Agyekum: Department of Nuclear and Renewable Energy, Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia Boris Yeltsin, Mira 19 St., 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
Tahir Khan: College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Nimay Chandra Giri: Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Jatni 752050, Odisha, India

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 19, 1-24

Abstract: The use of solar water heaters (SWH) in both residential and commercial facilities is one of the possible ways to reduce electricity bills and the release of greenhouse gases (GHG). This study assessed the technical, economic, and environmental performance of a SWH system at six different locations in China (i.e., Lhasa, Lauchang, Wuhan, Kashi, Yumen, and Harbin). A comparison between two different working fluids (i.e., water and glycol) were modeled in the System Advisor Model in all six cities. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on some key technical and economic parameters to assess the impact of such parameters on the performance of SWH systems in the country. According to the results, Lhasa recorded the highest capacity factor of 11% and 10.70% using water and glycol as the working fluid, respectively. Lhasa was identified as the best location among the studied locations due to its high solar irradiation. The optimization study indicates that the optimum azimuth for China is 190°. It was also found that a 25% reduction in the outlet set temperature of the water can reduce the capacity factor from 11% to about 9.2%. Using the SWH as simulated in this study can reduce carbon dioxide emissions from 1252.87–2014.85 kg per year to 138.20–330.23 kg per year; the extent of reduction depends on the location of the SWHS, and the solar energy available at the area. Net electricity bill savings of $156–296 could be obtained if SWH systems were installed and used at the studied locations.

Keywords: solar water heaters; techno-economics; sensitivity analysis; greenhouse gas emissions; heat exchanger (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14555/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14555/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14555-:d:1255078

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().