Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania
Milda Muraškienė (),
Kęstutis Armolaitis (),
Iveta Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė,
Virgilijus Baliuckas and
Jūratė Aleinikovienė
Additional contact information
Milda Muraškienė: Institute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, LT-53101 Kaunas, Lithuania
Kęstutis Armolaitis: Institute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, LT-53101 Kaunas, Lithuania
Iveta Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė: Institute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, LT-53101 Kaunas, Lithuania
Virgilijus Baliuckas: Institute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, LT-53101 Kaunas, Lithuania
Jūratė Aleinikovienė: Department of Agronomy, Vytautas Magnus University Agriculture Academy, LT-53361 Kaunas, Lithuania
Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 22, 1-17
Abstract:
The effective management of soil organic carbon (SOC) is highlighted as one of the strategies and cost-effective options for mitigating climate change, while soil nitrogen (N) often is specified as an essential element for plant growth. This study was conducted to evaluate basic soil physical, chemical, and microbial indicators in three major soil types dominated in Lithuania—Arenosols, Retisols, and Cambisols—under forest land, perennial grassland, and arable land. Furthermore, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and nitrogen (SMBN), their ratio, and soil microbial respiration (microbial CO 2 ) next to SOC and total N were hypothesized to be important measures for assessing SOC stability under different land uses. Therefore, selected soil indicators were evaluated in the surface 0–10 and 10–20 cm mineral soil layers. The study results showed higher concentrations of SOC, N, SMBC, and SMBN, and soil microbial CO 2 in forest land and perennial grasslands than in arable land. The higher SMBC/SOC and SNBN/TN ratios indicated a higher ability to accumulate SOC and N in forest land and grasslands. Higher SOC immobilization in forest land and higher N immobilization in arable land were both specified by the obtained SMBC:SMBN ratio. This study identified forest land followed by grassland as the best land management practice that addresses soil C sequestration through higher C immobilisation. Assessing soil in forest land as a control land use next to the agricultural land could be a reasonable soil management practice to evaluate C sequestration in the region. Additionally, it was assumed that evaluation of the SMBC and SMBN concentrations together with soil physical and chemical indicators allow for a more effective assessment of SOC stability. Taken together, these findings support recommendation to develop grassland (and especially forest land systems) through afforestation or within agroforestry system, without reducing the importance of the agricultural sector.
Keywords: forest; grassland; arable land; mineral soil; Carbon immobilization; soil stability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/16042/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/16042/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:16042-:d:1282120
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().