What Are ILK in Relation to Science? Using the ‘Ethic of Equivocation’ to Co-Produce New Knowledge for Conservation

Meredith Root-Bernstein (), Pierre du Plessis, Matías Guerrero-Gatica, Trupthi Narayan, Samuel Roturier and Helen C. Wheeler
Additional contact information
Meredith Root-Bernstein: Musée National d’Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France
Pierre du Plessis: Oslo School of Environmental Humanities, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway
Matías Guerrero-Gatica: Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability, Santiago 8331150, Chile
Trupthi Narayan: Department of Geography, University of Paris Nanterre, 92000 Nanterre, France
Samuel Roturier: Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique Evolution, F-91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Helen C. Wheeler: School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 3, 1-14

Abstract: Attention to epistemological relationships between Indigenous and local knowledges (ILK) and conservation science is increasing. Some approaches for doing so have been developed, but in general, serious engagement between ILK and science still feels experimental and does not have broad uptake. Here we address some of the main issues that arise when considering the epistemological relationships between ILK and conservation or ecological science. A key issue is the relationship between ILK and science that sets the expectations for how they may form dialogues, collaborations, or co-production. After reviewing several perspectives on this relationship, and their limitations, we suggest that a focus on shared meanings within an ‘ethic of equivocation’ is a productive path forward. In an ethic of equivocation, neither ILK nor science validates the other, yet meaning can be created. We explain and develop the concepts of meanings and equivocation in the ILK-science context. We, thus, argue for a broad and rich understanding of the joint roles of ILK and science, which goes beyond treating ILK as a data source. We argue that diverse styles of reasoning exist in science, and scientists may already treat observations, models, and collaborations in the ways that we discuss, providing ready-made analogies for thinking about ILK. We also discuss how to avoid abuses of power while engaging with ILK to co-produce new knowledge.

Keywords: indigenous and local knowledges; conservation; ecology; equivocation; dialogue; integration; co-production (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1831/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1831/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1831-:d:1039520

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().